Apr. 17th, 2018

undeleterious: two sambal oelek chili paste jars filled with black and pink paper stars, in front of some animorphs books on a shelf (Default)
via https://ift.tt/2H8nJws

hoofbitch:

just-another-secret-gaygent:

mandatalks:

I just had the best encounter with a child at Kmart. I was in the aisle shopping, and this girl and her dad come around the corner. The girl sees me and excitedly exclaims “There’s a human here!!” to which the father replied “Yes, there’s humans everywhere.”

bro do you realize you met aliens

not unusual for a kmart
undeleterious: two sambal oelek chili paste jars filled with black and pink paper stars, in front of some animorphs books on a shelf (Default)
via https://ift.tt/2JSGlOT

recently I’m very into the beauty and kindness of other people in the material world, and the beauty of religious art (including music, architecture, etc), as religious inspiration
undeleterious: two sambal oelek chili paste jars filled with black and pink paper stars, in front of some animorphs books on a shelf (Default)
via https://ift.tt/2HwKgSS

a gay verse is a piece of writing arranged with a metrical rhythm, typically having a rhyme, which is willing to either top or bottom in penetrative sex
undeleterious: two sambal oelek chili paste jars filled with black and pink paper stars, in front of some animorphs books on a shelf (Default)
via https://ift.tt/2qDXLXi

vampire synagogue with a no-dairy kitchen policy because it’s a priority to keep the kitchen blood (meat) based
undeleterious: two sambal oelek chili paste jars filled with black and pink paper stars, in front of some animorphs books on a shelf (Default)
via https://ift.tt/2qFpo2i

valkyriethunderbitch:

turing-tested:

not to get all Gender Studies on yall but we’ve got to stop pushing this idea to young questioning people that if they dont like being a girl sometimes then they’re obviously trans, or genderfluid.

this absolutely isnt to say that some people ARENT genderfluid+trans, but refusing to factor in how society makes being a woman a wholly unpleasant experience is disingenuous and can lead to a lot of gnc people thinking that if they’re uncomfortable with what their gender is supposed to dress and look like, they must be trans.

please allow room for gnc people in your discussions when you’re telling some young girl who doesn’t like being sexualized that shes trans. please allow room for nuance. thats all in asking for.

I like this post and I reblogged it because the message is important, but this is really not the type of thing that should be coming from a dude.

Non-women don’t have any business speaking as though they’re an authority on what it’s like to be a woman.

I know this post is from more than a month ago but I’m still really confused about it. questioning womanhood, feeling discomfort with being identified as girls/women, trying to disentangle what about it is “women are treated badly” and what about it is “women are not me”, and being treated badly by people enacting misogyny, are very common experiences for non-women. are we supposed to just… not talk about that? like, do you only get a “talk about how getting sexually harassed estranges you from womanhood” card if you’re currently aligning with womanhood? it seems like that shuts down a big chunk of the conversation. is that a chunk that should be shut down?
undeleterious: two sambal oelek chili paste jars filled with black and pink paper stars, in front of some animorphs books on a shelf (Default)
via https://ift.tt/2JR38KK

[ID: a panel from Peanuts of Linus speaking emphatically. his speech bubble reads, in all caps, “If it can be destroyed by the truth, it deserves to be destroyed by the truth.” /end ID]
undeleterious: two sambal oelek chili paste jars filled with black and pink paper stars, in front of some animorphs books on a shelf (Default)
via https://ift.tt/2vmpMrn

helenkgreenwood:

commonsensemom:

helenkgreenwood:

iwilleatyourenglish:

helenkgreenwood:

I’m super amused whenver people write about their god in their posts, but they write it “g-d” instead of “god.” Like, as if god is browsing Tumblr, sorting the naughty and nice (making a list and checking it twice) by who uses his name, but he’s only about as tech-savvy as my late grandma who no shit up and quit her job in a huff the minute computers replaced typewriters ) and so he’s super easy to fool and won’t catch on (god probably types one finger at a time.) As if tricking a supreme being is as simple and easy using l33t to fool filters on old message boards (look it up, kids.) Even when I was Christian, I would have never done this - I honestly never thought any being worthy of being called a god would be so easily fooled. I kind of imagined a god being a bit smarter than that, a bit better at being, you know, a god, but hey that’s just me.

I’m told this is done for respect, but the message I get every time is that they think they can pull a fast one and god won’t know any better. It just - it cracks me up every time.

maybe it wouldn’t crack you up as much if you actually did like… basic research and learned why people type G-d? like you clearly don’t get it.

first of all, it is often Jewish people who do so (not all Jewish people, of course; some Christians also do it) and laughing at the religious practice a deeply persecuted group is actually not an awesome thing to do.

secondly, it is not trying to “pull a fast one” on God. it is literally JUST a sign of respect stemming from an interpretation of a commandment in Deuteronomy that commands against destroying and erasing God’s name. the logic is that, if you don’t write it out, you won’t be able to erase it.

there’s a lot of discussion on this topic, with some religious leaders and scholars arguing that this rule only applies when God’s name has been written out in Hebrew. others refuse to discard anything containing God’s name in any language or write it out.

that’s it. just because you don’t agree with or understand something doesn’t… make it worthy of mockery.

Oh honey I did look it up and it only got funnier. Found a website where they said typed it that way on their site for feed that someone might print a page and then throw that page in the trash.

Of all the -

And like I said, writing it god or g-d is the exact same -theyve only just made the latter an alternate spelling.

Of course I prefer to write it as ‘imaginary friend.’

And dude, I will mock this just as I mock the idea that the earth is flat. People get respect, not every nonsense thing in their head. And if ya do something funny, I’m going to laugh.

I’m thinking it might also stem from taking God’s name in vien? (Just an assumption based on the commandment of not taking the lords name in vien).
But tbh, everyone has their own thing when it comes to God. There are many demoninations with a list of ‘rules’ so it’s hard to tell exactly why a person is blanking out the name.

That’s what I assumed. That or because they find the word itself holy. But writing god and g-d is basically functionally the same, that’s my point.

1) in Judaism, the Lord is omniscient and omnipresent. It’s aware of all things, including, of course, words you type on tumblr.net

2) the “alternate spelling” is what’s religiously prescribed, there’s nothing internally inconsistent about the rule. I can promise you with absolute certainty that you are not a better rules lawyer than thousands of years of Jewish scholars.

3) as a Christian you’re not supposed to follow the laws of Judaism. they are Jewish laws, which are… for Jews. following Jewish rules about the name of the lord would have been meaningless for you, whether or not you had been willing to do it.

4) many Jews follow various aspects of religious law regardless of what you might consider level of “religious belief”. there are many practicing atheist and agnostic Jews because our religious practices tie us together as a cultural group. your picture of religion here is clearly pretty stuck in Evangelicalism, with regards to both how vital belief in a deity is to “religion” as a concept in your opinion, and how you seem to assume that members of any group want non-members to observe ingroup religious practices. but whether you believe that Jewish ethno-cultural-religious practices constitute religion or not, please understand: mocking theism because you don’t believe in a deity and mocking Jewish laws and practices because you don’t get the logical arguments behind them are very different things, and you are doing the second thing.
undeleterious: two sambal oelek chili paste jars filled with black and pink paper stars, in front of some animorphs books on a shelf (Default)
via https://ift.tt/2J0LsLC

valkyriethunderbitch replied to your post “valkyriethunderbitch: turing-tested: not to get all Gender…”

Your reading comprehension is poor. And non-women still have zero business speaking as if they know what it’s like to be a woman. They don’t. At all.

I am pretty easily confused a. lot of the time, so I try to ask clarifying questions when I don’t understand stuff. if you have the time/care to answer, do you mean that… 

non-women shouldn’t speak about issues involving the identity of womanhood because they’re not knowledgeable/have bad analysis (and even examples like turing-tested saying something insightful are just the “even a stopped clock is right twice a day” principle, he doesn’t actually understand women’s experiences or what he’s saying but it made sense by some kind of coincidence)

or non-women shouldn’t speak on this because, regardless of whether their analysis is correct or not, it’s just morally wrong?

what about when the experiences they’re talking about are very clearly and materially their own experiences, e.g. “as a transmasc, i know that when people read you as a GNC woman they treat you pretty badly.” 

what’s the dividing line between woman enough/not woman enough to talk about womanhood? is it about experiences, or about the words someone uses to identify themself?
undeleterious: two sambal oelek chili paste jars filled with black and pink paper stars, in front of some animorphs books on a shelf (Default)
via https://ift.tt/2HHr02P

aromantic-eight:

sashayed:

montereybayaquarium:

We made one.

#please think about the ocean more so we don’t have to do this ever again ( @montereybayaquarium )

[id: old guy with a very impressive white moustache that comes down the side of his chin and partway along his jaw is sitting in an office chair, pointing away angrily. A white text box underneath says “We have to reach people where they are for conservation to break through the noise!” Another guy in a baseball cap points a finger downward angrily, with a text box saying, in quotes, “”How do you do, fellow kids? This institution tweets, did we engage you?”” The first guy leans forward, and text box says: “This is a really popular meme right now- maybe it can generate a non-zero amount of ocean awareness!” Someone throws a chair. Baseball hat guy: “You’re devaluing your scientific authority by copping to the latest pop-culture trend! You brand’s relevance comes from your institutions reputation of excellence in marine education and this isn’t it!” White moustache guy points: “The ocean is the most relevant topic of discussion every day on a water planet! Using modern communication platforms and their unique languages to remind land-based humanity of the oft-ignored heart of Earth’s life-support system IS our brand!” end id]
undeleterious: two sambal oelek chili paste jars filled with black and pink paper stars, in front of some animorphs books on a shelf (Default)
via https://ift.tt/2J7et87

im looking at a list of gender identity and orientation labels 

w/r/t the gender identity ones a lot of them are definitely like… “word for all the exact stuff i associate with my gender”, “duplicate of demigender”, “fluid in a very specific way”. a lot of them duplicate each other. a lot of them are about being confused or unable to determine gender, a lot of them reference anxiety, a lot of them reference unknowability and indescribability. i think with a lot of these it genuinely seems easier to just describe how you experience gender in a post or your about, but i understand the comfort of belonging to a label, and how this kind of list could function as an aid for introspection (”now that you mention it, i realize that i do feel that way”). i feel like a lot of these principally make sense in reference to other terms, e.g. “Aesthetigender: a gender that is derived from an aesthetic; also known as videgender” so like… butch, masc, femme, and fem as gender identities? but also a potential expansion of that category? or maybe something else. 90sthrowbackgender. softgothgender. i do worry, from the way the list is formatted with everything as “a gender that ___”, that people are mistaking maps for territories, that is, mistaking particular words for experiences as distinct essences within themselves. also a bunch of them sound like being in the closet but anyway.

w/r/t the orientation ones, again, a lot of them duplicate each other, even moreso than with the genders. far fewer of them reference confusion, anxiety, or unknowability. they are mostly concerned with gender of the person using the label and gender of the people they’re attracted to, with a minority being concerned with what the type of attraction is. i think it makes sense for there to be duplicate proposed terms for, e.g., nblw, including trixic and feminamoric. this is how it has always been, with different terms catching on at different times. from molly to invert to uranian to homosexual to gay, with various overlaps. we’ve been trying to create a coherent system of community terminology according to our conceptions of gender and sexuality for uh a while now. (sidenote: someone invented “uranic” for “anything but women/woman-aligned which is super funny to me. the new uranians.)
undeleterious: two sambal oelek chili paste jars filled with black and pink paper stars, in front of some animorphs books on a shelf (Default)
via https://ift.tt/2qH1bb7

tumblr just deleted my three paragraph response lol

re: neurodivergency/gender failure entanglement I big relate bc I’ve been getting shit for wearing clothes wrong and having hair wrong and having wrong interests in the wrong way and going through puberty wrong and doing everything wrong and fucking, smelling wrong since like. mid elementary school/birth. its all connected!

re: liking having words I relate to that too! I very much understand the desire and I don’t think it’s wrong at all.

re: these labels particularly, I think they’re totally valid (defined here as “emotionally understandable and morally defensible”) to use, even the ones where I’m like… I really dk if defining “feeling like a certain gender yet being more comfortable identifying with another” as a whole facet of your being in this way is going to work out great for you. it might be bad for you but it’s not bad to do. I think they’re often better for like, a sense of “i really do exist” than they are for communication bc they’re very little known and a lot of them are kind of confusingly similar, but people memorize more stuff with less reason. probably the function decently well for communication within circles where they’re better known and/or people are willing to spend more time cross referencing lists.
while I was writing my first response I was like “ok so take the example of the hypothetical uhhhh subvectorsolarian” and then I referenced the list and figured out that it means “mostly agender with some not-exactly masc nonbinary”* and I was like “oh shit! that’s me!”

it deleted it AGAIN but I had recently copied so the above text was saved. anyway. 

as cheering as that was, I don’t really think IDing as subvectorsolarian would be useful for me. introducing myself as nonbinary at school is already pushing enough of a limit in that arena, and my friends, well, know me personally, and I think know what’s up. online I think people still mostly won’t know what I’m talking about unless they both referencing this or a similar list. I find it mostly sufficient to use more common identity labels and talk about my experiences. that said, I think “people won’t know what you mean” is a bad and unreasonable reason to tell someone not to make or identify with a word for themself, and people who use these labels are valid.

*sub = mostly agender with a bit of ___, vector = coming close to but not exactly ___, solarian = masc nonbinary without explicitly referencing “maleness”, IMO a more nonbinary-friendly way to talk about it
Tags:
undeleterious: two sambal oelek chili paste jars filled with black and pink paper stars, in front of some animorphs books on a shelf (Default)
via https://ift.tt/2HxxBiH

I don’t much care for the sun but I would probably use solarian if it became popular. I think “masc/male aligned/transmasc/that general scene” and the feminine equivalent — but not explicitly referenced in alignment with the binary, existing in a specifically nonbinary context — are broad, common experiences that having common-use words for would be VERY convenient and helpful. a good word for unaligned nb is much needed as well. solarian/lunarian/stellarian is pretty good wordcraft (existing sun-is-masc moon-is-fem associations in multiple cultures, stars are numerous like unaligned nonbinary experiences, words are easy to spell, remember, and pronounce)

Profile

undeleterious: two sambal oelek chili paste jars filled with black and pink paper stars, in front of some animorphs books on a shelf (Default)
nick, hailmaryfullofgrace55675

November 2022

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
1314151617 1819
20212223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Oct. 9th, 2025 12:40 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios